<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eric tatro dot com &#187; Podcasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erictatro.com/category/podcasting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erictatro.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Indie podcasts face monetization and other challenges</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/04/monetization_other_challenges_for_indie_podcasts.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/04/monetization_other_challenges_for_indie_podcasts.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/2007/04/monetization_other_challenges_for_indie_podcasts.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BusinessWeek online examines the revenue-generating possibilities of podcasts, and finds independent podcasters aren&#8217;t exactly rolling in dough. I think there are a few limiting factors that contribute to this issue; Namely, there is no AdSense equivalent for podcasters. I know plenty of bloggers who make a couple hundred dollars a month (on the low end) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_15/b4029078.htm?chan=careers_careers_top+story">BusinessWeek online examines the revenue-generating possibilities of podcasts</a>, and finds independent podcasters aren&#8217;t exactly rolling in dough. I think there are a few limiting factors that contribute to this issue; Namely, <strong>there is no AdSense equivalent for podcasters</strong>. I know plenty of bloggers who make a couple hundred dollars a month (on the low end) in AdSense revenue alone, but podcasters have to seek out their own advertising or get lucky and have an advertiser contact them, which can be difficult.</p>
<p>Second, <strong>podcasts require a listener time commitment</strong>. It used to be common for me to listen to shows that were over an hour, but I&#8217;ve largely dropped long shows in favor of podcasts no longer than a half-hour in length. Even so, I can only listen to a maximum of three shows a day during my commute. That limits audiences. In contrast, I can scan over a hundred blogs a day.</p>
<p><strong>Third, podcasts are difficult to do well</strong>. They require investment in expensive recording equipment and time on the host&#8217;s part. And let&#8217;s face it- Not everyone can convey an engaging personality in a talk show format. It&#8217;s no fluke that many of the top &#8220;podcasts&#8221; are actually re-runs of traditional radio programs.</p>
<p>Podcasts may work best, at this point, as part of an online &#8220;brand.&#8221; <a href="http://www.diggnation.com/">Diggnation</a> is one popular example, which complements and presumably drives traffic to <a href="http://www.digg.com/">Digg.com</a>, where the real money is made. BusinessWeek tells the story of <a href="http://www.keithandthegirl.com/">Keith and the Girl</a>, which is anchored by a podcast but supplemented by forums and a popular MySpace page that have enabled a community to be built around the show. </p>
<p>By building community and diversifying the way they distribute information, these brands are able to reach out to more people in a variety of ways and make listeners feel like an integral part of the show, which is the best motivation I can think of for sustaining a regular audience. Podcasters who ignore these strategies may find themselves lost in the shuffle.</p>
<p>EDIT 4.6.07: I updated the headline to (hopefully) flow a bit better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/04/monetization_other_challenges_for_indie_podcasts.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media 2007 in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/02/social_media_2007_in_chicago.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/02/social_media_2007_in_chicago.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weblogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/2007/02/social_media_2007_in_chicago.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is anybody else going to this? If you&#8217;re coming in from out of town, drop me a line. I&#8217;d be happy to grab a post-conference bite or drink and talk shop.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anybody else going to <a href="http://www.socialmedia2007.com/">this</a>? If you&#8217;re coming in from out of town, drop me a line. I&#8217;d be happy to grab a post-conference bite or drink and talk shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/02/social_media_2007_in_chicago.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five tips for landing an internship</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/01/five-tips-for-landing-an-internship.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/01/five-tips-for-landing-an-internship.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Year usually signifies the start of the “second semester” at most universities and with the new semester come thoughts of planning for summer internships. I regret I only had one internship while I was in college, although that single internship prepared me more for “real world” employment than five years of classroom learning. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New Year usually signifies the start of the “second<br />
semester” at most universities and with the new semester come thoughts of<br />
planning for summer internships. I regret I only had one internship while I was<br />
in college, although that single internship prepared me more for “real world”<br />
employment than five years of classroom learning. It also led directly to my<br />
first job, where I was able to, in turn, interview and closely work with<br />
college interns. Based on this experience, here are my five tips for landing an<br />
internship, PR or otherwise:</p>
<p><strong>1. Apply for non-paying positions&nbsp;</strong></p>
<p>The most sought-after internships tend to be those that pay<br />
interns a stipend or by the hour, which is certainly understandable. However,<br />
many terrific organizations have unpaid internship opportunities where the<br />
learning potential is (excuse the cliché) priceless. Because they are unpaid,<br />
these opportunities can fly under the radar and are often less competitive. The<br />
skills you make and contacts you meet are well worth what can be an insanely<br />
busy schedule for the summer.</p>
<p><strong>2. Research the organization and the field&nbsp;</strong></p>
<p>Before you interview, at the very least visit the Web site<br />
of the organization you’re interviewing with. It’s extremely likely the<br />
interviewers will ask you what you know about the organization, and this is an<br />
ideal opportunity to impress your interviewers with your preparedness. It also<br />
shows you take the internship opportunity seriously.</p>
<p><strong>3. Dress up!&nbsp;</strong></p>
<p>I was always surprised at the number of potential interns<br />
who showed up to interviews dressed very casually. It’s understandable if you<br />
don’t own a suit, but at least dress in a business-appropriate style, even if<br />
the organization you’re interviewing with has a very casual dress code. Again,<br />
dressing well shows you take the opportunity seriously and behave in a<br />
professional manner.</p>
<p><strong>4. Bring a portfolio&nbsp;</strong></p>
<p>By the time you start applying for internships, you’ve<br />
probably had at least a couple years of college education under your belt. &nbsp;That surely includes several projects and<br />
class assignments. (You are saving that stuff, right?) Put five-to-seven<br />
samples of your best work in plastic sleeves and snap the sleeves into a nice,<br />
professional-looking binder. Number the pages and include a table of contents<br />
at the beginning so the binder is easy to navigate. Now you have several<br />
concrete examples of good work you’ve done in the past to show your<br />
interviewers.</p>
<p><strong>5. Ask questions&nbsp;</strong></p>
<p>You want your interviewers to know you’re enthusiastic about<br />
the internship opportunity at stake, and asking questions is one way to<br />
accomplish that. It also enables you to determine if the opportunity is the<br />
right one for you – We’ve all heard stories of interns who did little else but<br />
fetch coffee and run errands unrelated to their future career field. Ask your<br />
interviewers about specific tasks you’ll be asked to perform and what projects<br />
interns have worked on in the past. If you don’t like the answers and you are<br />
offered the internship, you can always politely decline and look for<br />
opportunities elsewhere.</p>
<p><strong>BONUS TIP: Send thank-you letters&nbsp;</strong></p>
<p>After you interview, go home and write up thank-you letters<br />
addressed to each of your interviewers. If you’re still interested, re-affirm<br />
your interest and let your interviewers know your skills would be well-suited<br />
to the position. Send the letters within 24 hours of the interview. It seems<br />
like most intern candidates failed to follow-up with a thank-you letter, but<br />
it’s a crucial step – It keeps you prominent in the minds of the interviewers<br />
and demonstrates your commitment and enthusiasm.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/01/five-tips-for-landing-an-internship.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PR is not dying, it&#8217;s changing for the better</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2006/03/pr-is-not-dying-its-changing-for-the-better.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2006/03/pr-is-not-dying-its-changing-for-the-better.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weblogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last couple of years there has been discussion about whether new media tools like blogging, podcasting and wikis have make public relations irrelevant, and indeed, if the PR industry is slowly &#34;dying&#34; as a result.Giovanni Rodriguez lays out some challenges facing the PR industry and why, ultimately, the &#34;new media&#34; tools that have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last couple of years there has been discussion about whether new media tools like blogging, podcasting and wikis have make public relations irrelevant, and indeed, if the PR industry is slowly &quot;dying&quot; as a result.<br /><a href="http://eastwikkers.typepad.com/eastwikkers_/2006/03/are_pr_people_c.html"><br />Giovanni Rodriguez</a> lays out some challenges facing the PR industry and why, ultimately, the &quot;new media&quot; tools that have recently emerged are beneficial for the industry. He writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>For many years, particularly in technology, PR meant media relations,<br />
and little else. Now, many of us for the first time see there&#8217;s an<br />
opportunity to assist our clients in doing what our profession<br />
professes we do: &quot;relating to the public.&quot; And forward-looking PR<br />
people have already awakened to this reality, and are beginning to see<br />
how what we have always been good at may in fact command a premium in<br />
the new world. It&#8217;s a little thing called &quot;social intelligence.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. We should be optimistic about the current direction and the future of public relations. It&#8217;s an exciting time to be involved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2006/03/pr-is-not-dying-its-changing-for-the-better.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet is most important tool when deciding what car to buy</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2006/02/internet-is-most-important-tool-when-deciding-what-car-to-buy.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2006/02/internet-is-most-important-tool-when-deciding-what-car-to-buy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 00:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weblogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget newspapers, magazines or television; When it comes to purchasing a new vehicle for the first time, the Internet is the most important source of information, according to a study by the Polk Center for Automotive Studies. From the press release: Out of considered mass media outlets, thirty-five percent of first-time vehicle buyers consider the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget newspapers, magazines or television; When it comes to purchasing a new vehicle for the first time, the Internet is the most important source of information, according to a study by the <a href="http://usa.polk.com/News/LatestNews/2006_0131_pcas_3rdstudy.htm">Polk Center for Automotive Studies</a>. From the press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>Out of considered mass media outlets,<br />
thirty-five percent of first-time vehicle buyers consider the Internet<br />
to be their most important informational tool, compared to 8.2 percent<br />
for television, 4.4 percent for magazines, 3.6 percent for newspapers<br />
and 1.1 percent for radio.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Internet is unparalleled for allowing potential consumers to compare and contrast information on a number of potential purchases, and this is extremely important when purchasing a car, with the depth and difference of features and technologies available among various auto models.</p>
<p>Internet technologies also allow vehicle companies and enthusiasts to engage in a dialog with consumers, answer questions, and most importantly, develop a connection. If a company can establish brand loyalty in a consumer and make them feel like they belong to a community, then there&#8217;s a good chance they&#8217;ve made a customer for life. Loyalty is very important among car-buyers, and the automotive companies know that. If the Internet proves effective in helping auto companies establish this loyalty, expect to see a lot more sponsored blogs and podcasts in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2006/02/internet-is-most-important-tool-when-deciding-what-car-to-buy.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are The 15 Minutes Up for Podcasting?</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/11/are-the-15-minutes-up-for-podcasting.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/11/are-the-15-minutes-up-for-podcasting.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 02:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Rubel posted a link to a CNBC poll that seems to indicate most people feel podcasting is nothing but a fad, and it got me thinking. I&#8217;ve mentioned before that I&#8217;m a huge fan of podcasting, and I still am&#8230; Kind of. When podcasting first started, I thought it was the most incredible thing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/">Steve Rubel</a> posted a link to a <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/CNBCTV/Promos/P136149.asp">CNBC poll</a> that seems to indicate most people feel podcasting is nothing but a fad, and it got me thinking.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve mentioned before that I&#8217;m a huge fan of podcasting, and I still am&#8230; Kind of.</p>
<p>When podcasting first started, I thought it was the most incredible thing ever. Niche shows! No commercials! I choose when to listen! Completely free!</p>
<p>Fast forward one year. There are more podcasts than ever, so why don&#8217;t I feel the same enthusiasm as I did a year ago?</p>
<p>Last year I would listen to almost any podcast, even if the sound quality was bad or the on-air personalities didn&#8217;t have &quot;radio voices.&quot; Since then, I&#8217;ve found that my tolerance for less-than-professional shows has waned, even though that was originally part of the medium&#8217;s appeal. The &quot;raw voices&quot; simply don&#8217;t appeal to me as they once did. Furthermore, any &quot;new&quot; technology is exciting at first. Now that podcasting has been essentially mainstreamed, it&#8217;s not as new and it&#8217;s not as exciting.</p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t want to sound too pessimistic. I do listen to a number of podcasts on a near-daily basis, and I still find them all extremely entertaining. Right now on my iPod I have shows about <a href="http://www.comicgeekspeak.com/">comic books</a>, <a href="http://www.forimmediaterelease.biz/">public relations</a>, <a href="http://www.catholicinsider.com/">Catholicism</a>, <a href="http://orangeloungeradio.com/phpnuke/">video games</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/">gadgets</a> and <a href="http://thisweekintech.com/">technology</a>, and <a href="http://www.paranormalpodcast.com/">paranormal activity</a>! Such an eclectic mix will never be found on commercial radio, and as far as I&#8217;m concerned, that&#8217;s podcasting&#8217;s greatest strength. Podcasts have also made strides in how they&#8217;re delivered with the increasing use of tools like BitTorrent and iTunes. In addition, a lot of those early podcasters with the &quot;raw voices&quot; and bad sound quality have some experience and decent equipment under their belts, making their shows very listenable.</p>
<p>Ultimately, I really don&#8217;t feel podcasting will only be with us for the proverbial &quot;15 minutes.&quot; I do think the technology is maturing, however, and the improved selection of shows allows us listeners to exercise more discretion. The biggest change for me is that I&#8217;m no longer a fan of <em>podcasting, </em>per se, but I am a fan of <em>podcasts.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/11/are-the-15-minutes-up-for-podcasting.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Portable Video Make an Impact?</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/10/will-portable-video-make-an-impact.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/10/will-portable-video-make-an-impact.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 03:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve got to admit, I&#8217;m fairly astounded by all of the media coverage of the new iPod and its video-playing capabilities. While I do think the new iPod is cool, it&#8217;s far from revolutionary- There have been hard-drive based portable video devices on the market for years. The interesting side-effect of the new iPod announcement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to admit, I&#8217;m fairly astounded by all of the media coverage of the <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipod/ipod.html">new iPod</a> and its video-playing capabilities. While I do think the new iPod is cool, it&#8217;s far from revolutionary- There have been hard-drive based portable video devices on the market for years. The interesting side-effect of the new iPod announcement is the sudden interest over portable video, and the impact it&#8217;s set to make.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a huge proponent of podcasting since the very beginning (probably just over a year, now). The idea that I could take interesting, commercial-free audio shows with me in my car was extremely exciting, and I can credit podcasting with making the 35,000 miles I&#8217;ve put on my car in the past year a whole lot less boring. That&#8217;s the terrific thing about listening to audio- It&#8217;s a secondary activity. I can drive, work out at the gym (yeah, right) or walk the dog and still catch up on my podcasts. However, I couldn&#8217;t do any of these things while watching a video.</p>
<p>Second, because video is a visual medium, it&#8217;s best experienced on a larger screen. The reason I haven&#8217;t been watching portable video isn&#8217;t because I haven&#8217;t had a way to do it (my cell phone Sony PSP will both play video quite well). Rather, it&#8217;s because I haven&#8217;t really cared to do it. Video on a small screen leaves something to be desired, and I simply don&#8217;t have enough &quot;hostage time&quot; that would allow me to watch portable video in the first place. </p>
<p>I think the most exciting development announced by Steve Jobs at yesterday&#8217;s event was the fact that iTunes users can now download television shows for $1.99 a piece. Video over iTunes also offers another possible avenue for video podcasting (vidcasting?) and, if networks besides ABC get in on the action, perhaps a serviceable solution for &quot;TV ala carte.&quot; If that&#8217;s the case, it would be truly revolutionary.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Word is <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2005/10/13/nbc-in-talks-with-apple/">NBC is also in negotiations</a> with Apple to offer shows via iTunes. Never miss an episode of <a href="http://www.nbc.com/The_Office/">The Office</a> again! (Maybe.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/10/will-portable-video-make-an-impact.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo&#8217;s New Podcast Search</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/10/yahoos-new-podcast-search.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/10/yahoos-new-podcast-search.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo&#8217;s new podcast search area (via Scobleizer) is very cool- Perhaps the best I&#8217;ve used. Well organized, good use of tags, and very fast. Finding podcasts is much faster and easier compared to iTunes (for me, at least), but users are still given the option of using the iTunes jukebox. Yahoo! hit this one on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://podcasts.yahoo.com/">Yahoo&#8217;s new podcast search area</a> (via <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/">Scobleizer</a>) is very cool- Perhaps the best I&#8217;ve used. Well organized, good use of tags, and very fast. Finding podcasts is much faster and easier compared to iTunes (for me, at least), but users are still given the option of using the iTunes jukebox. Yahoo! hit this one on the mark!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/10/yahoos-new-podcast-search.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will &#8220;Pro&#8221; Podcasters Edge Out Hobbyists?</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/06/will-pro-podcasters-edge-out-hobbyists.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/06/will-pro-podcasters-edge-out-hobbyists.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 04:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN recently added a new &#34;Podcasting&#34; page that offers their podcast feeds and explains how to subscribe to them. Of course, CNN is just one of many professional broadcasters now offering their audio via downloadable podcast. Some, like Jim Rome and Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s podcasts, require a subscription. CNN&#8217;s is completely free, and is updated twice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN recently added a new <a href="http://www.cnn.com/services/podcasting/">&quot;Podcasting&quot; page</a> that offers their podcast feeds and explains how to subscribe to them. Of course, CNN is just one of many professional broadcasters now offering their audio via downloadable podcast. Some, like <a href="http://www.jimrome.com/home/jungle/podcast.html">Jim Rome</a> and <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/podcastlandingpage.guest.html">Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s</a> podcasts, require a subscription. CNN&#8217;s is completely free, and is updated twice daily.</p>
<p>Professional broadcasters are entering the podcast game in a big way, and the ball has only started rolling. Up until now, podcasting has, for the most part, been the domain of amateur hobbyists, who podcast about their various interests, ranging from <a href="http://www.catholicinsider.com/">religion</a> to <a href="http://www.sledheadradio.com/">snowmobiling</a>. The unique flavor of hobbyist podcasting has contributed to its popularity- The main reason I listen to podcasts instead of the radio is precisely because of this aspect. Rather than being forced to listen to the limited scope of topics aired on broadcast radio, I can listen to a show about a very specific topic that I&#8217;m acutely interested in.</p>
<p>That being said, most hobbyist podcasters simply will not be able to compete with a professional&#8217;s delivery or production values. As much as I hate to say it, if hobbyist podcasters attempt to compete with professional podcasts by tackling the same issues in the same format, they&#8217;re going to lose. To an Average Joe who is listening to podcasts for the first time, a hobbyist podcast is going to sound like &quot;Radio Junior.&quot; However, hobbyist podcasts will continue to thrive as long as they cater to a defined niche and offer unique viewpoints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/06/will-pro-podcasters-edge-out-hobbyists.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogging Will Not Replace Traditional PR Efforts</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/06/blogging-will-not-replace-traditional-pr-efforts.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/06/blogging-will-not-replace-traditional-pr-efforts.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weblogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shel Holtz wrote an outstanding post about calls to replace more &#34;traditional&#34; public relations efforts with blogs. Blogs will continue to play an increasingly large role in public relations efforts, but are not a &#34;be all, end all&#34; tool. Rather, they are an additional (and very useful) part of any PR professional&#8217;s toolbox. The same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.holtz.com/">Shel Holtz</a> wrote an <a href="http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/weblog/another_call_to_replace_pr_with_blogs/">outstanding post</a> about calls to replace more &quot;traditional&quot; public relations efforts with blogs. Blogs will continue to play an increasingly large role in public relations efforts, but are not a &quot;be all, end all&quot; tool. Rather, they are an additional (and very useful) part of any PR professional&#8217;s toolbox. The same goes for other &quot;new media&quot; tools like podcasts, wikis, etc.</p>
<p>A lot of great technology is beginning to mature before our eyes, and undoubtedly it will become &quot;mainstreamed&quot; very soon. I can imagine a day where press releases are exclusively issued by RSS instead of by e-mail or by fax. But when e-mail and fax machines were in their infancy, did most PR professionals think these technologies would replace postal mail as the preferred method of press release distribution?</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s overearly to sound the death knell of many PR tools (such as press releases), or even the PR industry itself, in the light of this &quot;new media&quot; technology. The industry is evolving, and the technology becoming available will give PR practitioners additional avenues to distribute messages. What a welcome and exciting development!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2005/06/blogging-will-not-replace-traditional-pr-efforts.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
