<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eric tatro dot com &#187; Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erictatro.com/category/music/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erictatro.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 01:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UK iTunes censors go overboard</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2008/10/uk_itunes_censors_go_overboard.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2008/10/uk_itunes_censors_go_overboard.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/2008/10/uk_itunes_censors_go_overboard.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently iTunes censors in the UK went a little nuts with the asterisks, non-nonsensically inserting asterisks into the names of anyone unfortunate enough to be named &#8220;Dick,&#8221; or, for some reason, &#8220;Johnny,&#8221; as well as other, seemingly random words: While iTunes has always asterisked potentially offensive entries in its database, recently the UK version of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently <a href="http://www.popnography.com/2008/10/apple-gets-aste.html">iTunes censors in the UK went a little nuts with the asterisks</a>, non-nonsensically inserting asterisks into the names of anyone unfortunate enough to be named &#8220;Dick,&#8221; or, for some reason, &#8220;Johnny,&#8221; as well as other, seemingly random words:</p>
<blockquote><p>While iTunes has always asterisked potentially offensive entries in its database, recently the UK version of the music retailer went on a censoring binge that blanked out hundreds of inoffensive song titles and artist names. The Dick Van Dyke song from Mary Poppins was changed to &#8220;The D**k Van D**e&#8221; song. Danny Kaye&#8217;s innocent little tune &#8220;I Thought I Saw a Pussy Cat&#8221; became &#8220;I Thought I Saw a P***y Cat.&#8221; Stranger yet, Johnny Cash and Johnny Mathis had their first names reduced to &#8220;J*****y&#8221; and Avril Lavigne&#8217;s &#8220;Hot&#8221; read &#8220;H*t.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Is J****y &#8211; er, Johnny &#8211; used in the UK as slang for a body part? Seriously, I can&#8217;t imagine why they&#8217;d censor that. Then again, I can&#8217;t imagine why they&#8217;d censor the word &#8220;hot,&#8221; either, so we&#8217;ll chalk it up to an honest mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2008/10/uk_itunes_censors_go_overboard.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metallica invites bloggers to listen to new album, won&#8217;t let them write about it</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2008/06/metallica_invites_bloggers_to_listen_to_new_album_wont_let_them_write_about_it.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2008/06/metallica_invites_bloggers_to_listen_to_new_album_wont_let_them_write_about_it.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/2008/06/metallica_invites_bloggers_to_listen_to_new_album_wont_let_them_write_about_it.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually, when a company invites the media or bloggers to an event to offer an exclusive early look at a product, the goal is to encourage said media or bloggers to write about that product. When Metallica invited bloggers to listen to its upcoming album, reviews inevitably popped up on the Web; reviews which Metallica&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually, when a company invites the media or bloggers to an event to offer an exclusive early look at a product, the goal is to encourage said media or bloggers to write about that product. When Metallica invited bloggers to listen to its upcoming album, reviews inevitably popped up on the Web; <a href="http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/06/metallica-kills.html">reviews which Metallica&#8217;s management promptly &#8220;forced&#8221; bloggers to take down.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Quietus kept our article up the longest and, as no non-disclosure agreement had been signed, [was] not prepared to remove it merely due to the demands of Metallica&#8217;s management,&#8221; Turner continued. &#8220;We only eventually removed the article earlier today to protect the professional interests of the writer concerned (the piece was written anonymously).&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Metallica has a long history of alienating their biggest fans, and clearly fears digital media, but this feels clumsy and ham-fisted even for them. If the album mix wasn&#8217;t final, they shouldn&#8217;t have invited writers to listen to it and then act shocked when they, you know, <em>wrote </em>about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2008/06/metallica_invites_bloggers_to_listen_to_new_album_wont_let_them_write_about_it.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony BMG makes you visit a store to download DRM-free tunes</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2008/01/sony_bmg_makes_you_visit_a_store_to_download_drm-free_tunes.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2008/01/sony_bmg_makes_you_visit_a_store_to_download_drm-free_tunes.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/2008/01/sony_bmg_makes_you_visit_a_store_to_download_drm-free_tunes.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I applauded Sony BMG when they announced they would be offering DRM-free music for download. After all, the idea of DRM is fundamentally broken &#8211; when there is an abundant supply of free music that will play on any device at high quality, why would people realistically pay for an inferior product? It&#8217;s worth noting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applauded Sony BMG when they announced they would be offering DRM-free music for download. After all, the idea of DRM is fundamentally broken &#8211; when there is an abundant supply of free music that will play on any device at high quality, why would people realistically pay for an inferior product?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that iTunes got around this point, to an extent, for a long time by providing a seamless user experience. And because iPods are far and away the best selling digital audio players, iPod owners didn&#8217;t really care that their iTunes-purchased music would only play on an iPod. Nonetheless, even Apple now offers DRM-free tracks from several labels, as do several other retailers. </p>
<p>Sony BMG appears to be missing the point of downloaded music entirely with their latest initiative, however. Yes, they are offering DRM-free tracks. But you have to <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2008-01-07-sony-music_N.htm">go to a retail store to buy a card</a> which will then let you go home and download your chosen album. Frankly, I&#8217;m baffled. It requires all of the trouble of going to a store to buy a CD, but without the satisfaction of owning a physical object. </p>
<p>And the music industry has the gall to complain about bleeding money.</p>
<p>UPDATE (1/11/07): I&#8217;m glad to learn that this isn&#8217;t the *only* way Sony BMG will be selling DRM-free music. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/343475/sony-bmg-officially-drops-drm-amazon-first-to-carry-drmfree-music-from-all-four-labels">They are also making their &#8220;entire catalog available&#8221; on Amazon&#8217;s MP3 digital music store</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2008/01/sony_bmg_makes_you_visit_a_store_to_download_drm-free_tunes.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The (record) labels killed themselves.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/06/the_record_labels_killed_themselves.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/06/the_record_labels_killed_themselves.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erictatro.com/2007/06/the_record_labels_killed_themselves.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rolling Stone is running a two-part series on &#8220;The Record Industry&#8217;s Decline.&#8221; They seem to pin the tipping point on the moment the industry refused to work with Napster in 2000, instead launching their own music download services, none of which worked as well as Napster. Soon after Napster shut down, what had been the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/15137581/the_record_industrys_decline/print">Rolling Stone</a> is running a two-part series on &#8220;The Record Industry&#8217;s Decline.&#8221; They seem to pin the tipping point on the moment the industry refused to work with Napster in 2000, instead launching their own music download services, none of which worked as well as Napster. Soon after Napster shut down, what had been the central-hub for music file sharing spread out among various networks, making the situation far worse than it was before. In 2003 the RIAA began suing people who downloaded music, and we all know how that&#8217;s gone down.</p>
<p>While the record industry blames the Internet, let&#8217;s remember the music trends that precipitated the industry&#8217;s fall. Boy bands? Bubblegum pop? Nu Metal?! I don&#8217;t think anyone thought these were artists with substance and staying power. I remember more than a few &#8220;modern rock&#8221; radio stations that couldn&#8217;t survive when the bottom fell out of that one &#8211; Now they&#8217;re either country, classic rock or &#8220;Jack&#8221; stations, which don&#8217;t adhere to any particular format. At the time, of course, there was nothing a good &#8220;Hit Me Baby One More Time&#8221; or &#8220;Nookie&#8221; couldn&#8217;t do for you:</p>
<blockquote><p>Just a few years ago, many industry executives thought their problems could be solved by bigger hits. &#8220;There wasn&#8217;t anything a good hit couldn&#8217;t fix for these guys,&#8221; says a source who worked closely with top executives earlier this decade. &#8220;They felt like things were bad and getting worse, but I&#8217;m not sure they had the bandwidth to figure out how to fix it. Now, very few of those people are still heads of the companies.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>The industry went for the easy fix, but it&#8217;s risky to live and die by the blockbuster. This business model is quite different than the industry of several decades ago, where artists were allowed to grow and stay with the label even with modest-selling albums.</p>
<p>As the article points out, thirst for music has not waned. Touring bands are raking in record money, as are digital download services like iTunes. Nearly every band gives a few songs away for free on their Web pages or on sites like MySpace, which certainly isn&#8217;t hurting for users. So while plenty of artists are circumventing the traditional path to success of &#8220;getting discovered&#8221; and being signed to a major label, the labels continue to suffer. Unfortunately for them, their bone-headed business decisions, contempt for their consumers and the inability to change in the face of new technology has them teetering on the brink of irrelevance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erictatro.com/2007/06/the_record_labels_killed_themselves.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
